If Vickers isn’t completely included in Ruben Selles’ first-team plans, then Vickers could think it’s worth pressing for a transfer to the Emirates.
Reading is now at the bottom of League One after failing to beat Bristol Rovers, a game they really needed to win.
Supporters have taken issue with manager Ruben Selles’s tactics and team choices, especially with his exclusion of talented rookie Caylan Vickers from the starting lineup.
Vickers is one of the gifted players that Reading might lose given their precarious financial circumstances. Vickers has drawn interest from teams like Arsenal. A bigger club could be able to offer you more playing time and a better wage.
Reading and Bristol Rovers drew 1-1 at the Select Car Leasing Stadium on Tuesday night, failing to earn a crucial three points.
The Royals are now at the bottom of League One and face a serious risk of losing additional ground after incurring fines from the EFL for persistently failing to pay HMRC.
In light of this, the hosts needed to win by three points, and they had a chance to do so when Sam Smith placed them ahead.
However, poor defence let Rovers draw even when former Royal Chris Martin lifted the ball past David Button in the 57th minute.
The home team shown unwavering dedication, and some Royals players, such as Andy Yiadom, had respectable performances.
However, there was a glaring lack of talent in the match, and many fans have turned against manager Ruben Selles as a result. His team choices and strategies have recently drawn criticism.
On Tuesday night, he abandoned the 4-2-2-2 formation, but many fans were perplexed by his choice to have Caylan Vickers in the starting lineup.
For what reason did Ruben Selles not include Caylan Vickers on the Reading FC roster?
Vickers was left out of the Fleetwood Town and Portsmouth matchday squads as well, which infuriated a lot of supporters given how potential the young player has occasionally shown this season.
When asked why he was left off the team against Rovers once more, Selles responded, “He hasn’t been in the League One squad for the last three to four games.”
Naturally, he was participating in the Cup because we rotated. With around 80 percent of the crew, I’ve been attempting to be reliable.
“However, I can’t have three strikers on the bench when we make the lineup. Sadly, we chose to go with Dom and Kelvin instead of Caylan.
“Caylan is working really hard but we cannot have 20 players on the bench.”
Dom Ballard and Kevin Ehibhatiomhan were on the sidelines as Sam Smith got the start against the Gas.
During his loan stint, Ballard has scored against Fleetwood, Northampton Town, and Exeter City; Ehibhatiomhan has also scored frequently and played effectively.
However, Vickers ought to have been included in the matchday roster since he is a stronger alternative than players like Femi Azeez and Harvey Knibbs, who have both struggled recently. Vickers can play on the flank.
Furthermore, given that Charlie Savage hasn’t played well for the majority of the season, Ben Elliott ought to have started in his place in the starting lineup, and Michael Craig was already available as a backup midfield option, one might even argue that Savage shouldn’t be included in the matchday squad.
What possible effects may Caylan Vickers’ absence from matchday squads have on an Arsenal/Reading FC trade?
The Royals are still in risk even if HMRC has been paid since it’s uncertain if owner Dai Yongge will be able to make timely payments on future invoices.
In light of this, it wouldn’t be shocking to see some of the most skilled players on the Royals sign deals with other teams in January.
The Berkshire team’s predicament will be known to other teams, and because some of its younger players are playing really well, they may be acquired at a low cost in the winter.
The likelihood of selling young players for a healthy profit in the future has many teams focusing on acquiring them, thus the Royals risk losing several important players unless their financial position improves or a takeover occurs.
Vickers and Tyler Bindon were reportedly the targets of Arsenal earlier in the season. However, given that Bindon struggled to make an impression as a full-back and even had some bad runs in his native position as a center-back, the Gunners could decide to go for Vickers instead of Bindon at this time.
Perusing FC’s Ranking of the Top 10 Greatest Managers Ever
The fact that Vickers will probably play more first-team football at the Select Car Leasing Stadium than he would at the Emirates is the one major benefit of his perhaps staying in Berkshire after January.
However, if Selles and/or his prospective replacement aren’t playing him much, the forward could feel it’s worthwhile to pursue a possible move to Mikel Arteta’s team.
You wouldn’t hold it against him—he ought to be playing far more frequently.
A transfer to the Emirates ought to bring with it a sizable pay boost and a respectable contract duration.
The Royals have excellent facilities and coaching in their development system because they are a Category One academy club, but Vickers will be eager to play as much first-team football as possible after making his breakthrough.
Additionally, the longer he is absent from the starting lineup for league games, the more likely it is that he will consider moving to the Gunners as a benefit.
It would be a major loss if he were to complete this transfer because he is a true asset for the lower league team.
Leave a Reply